A garden portrait with a peach, built from two attached images: one for the face, one for the dress. Seven runs. The negative list ends by asking, at the heaviest weight in the whole prompt, for no star watermark. Six of the seven have one.






The negative against the badge is the strongest instruction in the prompt, and it did nothing. Every group in the negative list carries a weight; most sit at 1.5–1.7. The heaviest, at 1.9, is star watermark, diamond shape artifact, logo on clothes, watermark on body, stamp. The four-point sparkle is in the bottom-right corner of six runs out of seven anyway. That fits what the badge post concluded: the mark is stamped onto the file after it is generated, so no prompt can reach it.
The weights are also partly broken. Three groups end in :1.😎 — a 1.8) that something along the way auto-converted into a sunglasses emoji, which ate the closing bracket too. So three of the negative groups are never closed, and how a tool reads that is anyone’s guess. It’s pasted here exactly as it was, emoji and all, because that is the prompt that made these pictures.
Holds across all seven: the white dress with a tiny pink floral print and a tie at the neckline, long dark wavy hair with small pink blossoms in it, the peach in nearly every frame, a thin bracelet, and a green, flower-filled setting. The face is consistent, which is the face reference doing its job.
Varies, against the text: the scene injection asks for one shot — standing, back turned, looking over the shoulder, beside a wooden wall. The first run is that, minus the wall. The rest sit, stand front-on or lean into a close-up, and most move into a glasshouse. The fourth gives the dress puff sleeves the other six don’t have, despite altered clothing pattern, distorted dress design:1.7. The “wet hair” is just wavy, and the “roses” are small five-petal blossoms.